Table Of ContentTHE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE
THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE is a non-profit,
non-partisan, scholarly re search and edu ca tional or ga -
ni za tion that spons ors com pre hen sive stud ies in po liti -
cal econ omy. Our mission is to boldly advance peaceful,
prosperous, and free societies, grounded in a commitment
to human worth and dignity.
Politicized decision-making in soc ie ty has conf ined public debate to a narrow rec ons id-
era tion of exi sti ng policies. Given the prev aili ng influence of partisan interests, little social
innovation has oc curred. In order to understand both the nature of and possible solutions to
major public issues, the Independent Institute adheres to the highest standards of in de pen-
d ent inquiry, re gard less of political or social biases and con ven tions. The resulting stud ies are
widely dis trib uted as books and other publications, and are debated in numerous conference
and m edia prog rams. Through this unc omm on depth and clarity, the Ind ep end ent Ins tit ute is
redefining public de bate and fostering new and ef fec tive directions for gov ern ment reform.
FOUNDER & PRESIDENT George Gilder Paul H. Rubin
David J. Theroux discovery institute emory university
RESEARCH DIRECTOR Nathan Glazer Bruce M. Russett
harvard university yale university
Alexander Tabarrok
Ronald Hamowy
SENIOR FELLOWS Pascal Salin
university of alberta, canada
university of paris, france
Bruce L. Benson Steve H. Hanke
Ivan Eland johns hopkins university Vernon L. Smith
Robert Higgs george mason university
James J. Heckman
Robert H. Nelson
university of chicago Pablo T. Spiller
Charles V. Peña
university of california,
William F. Shughart II H. Robert Heller
berkeley
Alvaro Vargas Llosa sonic automotive
Richard K. Vedder Deirdre N. McCloskey Joel H. Spring
ACADEMIC ADVISORS university of illinois, chicago state university of new york,
old westbury
Herman Belz J. Huston McCulloch
university of maryland ohio state university Richard L. Stroup
north carolina state
Thomas E. Borcherding Forrest McDonald
university
claremont graduate school university of alabama
Thomas S. Szasz
Boudewijn Bouckaert Thomas Gale Moore
state university of new york,
university of ghent, belgium hoover institution
syracuse
James M. Buchanan Charles Murray
Robert D. Tollison
george mason university american enterprise institute
clemson university
Allan C. Carlson Michael J. Novak, Jr.
Arnold S. Trebach
howard center american enterprise institute
american university
Robert D. Cooter June E. O’Neill
Gordon Tullock
university of california, baruch college
george mason university
berkeley
Charles E. Phelps
Robert W. Crandall university of rochester Richard E. Wagner
brookings institution george mason university
Paul Craig Roberts
Richard A. Epstein institute for political Walter E. Williams
university of chicago economy george mason university
B. Delworth Gardner Nathan Rosenberg Charles Wolf, Jr.
brigham young university stanford university rand corporation
100 Swan Way, Oak land, California 94621-1428, U.S.A.
Telephone: 510-632-1366 • Facsimile: 510-568-6040 • Email: [email protected] • www.independent.org
T P J
HE URSUIT OF USTICE
LAW AND ECONOMICS OF
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
Edited by
Edward J. López
Foreword by
Robert D. Tollison
Published in cooperation with The Independent Institute
THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE
Copyright © The Independent Institute, 2010.
Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2010978-0-230-10244-6
All rights reserved.
Cover image: © Kelly Redinger/Design Pics/Corbis.
Front cover design by Christopher Chambers.
First published in 2010 by
PALGRAVE MACMILLAN®
in the United States—a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC,
175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010.
Where this book is distributed in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world,
this is by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited,
registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills,
Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS.
Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies
and has companies and representatives throughout the world.
Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States,
the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries.
ISBN 978-0-230-10245-3 ISBN 978-0-230-10949-0 (eBook)
DOI 10.1057/9780230109490
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the
Library of Congress.
A catalogue record of the book is available from the British Library.
Design by Newgen Imaging Systems (P) Ltd., Chennai, India.
First edition: June 2010
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Contents
List of Illustrations vii
Foreword ix
Robert D. Tollison
Acknowledgments xi
1. An Introduction to The Pursuit of Justice 1
Edward J. López
2. The Rise of Government Law Enforcement in England 19
Nicholas A. Curott and Edward P. Stringham
3. Electoral Pressures and the Legal System: Friends or Foes? 37
Russell S. Sobel, Matt E. Ryan, and Joshua C. Hall
4. Romancing Forensics: Legal Failure in Forensic Science
Administration 51
Roger G. Koppl
5. Judicial Checks on Corruption 71
Adriana S. Cordis
6. Effects of Judicial Selection on Criminal Sentencing 103
Aleksandar Tomic and Jahn K. Hakes
7. Economic Development Takings as Government Failure 123
Ilya Somin
8. On the Impossibility of “Just Compensation” When
Property Is Taken: An Ethical and Epistemic Inquiry 145
John Brätland
9. The Lawyer-Judge Hypothesis 169
Benjamin H. Barton
10. Class Action Rent Extraction: Theory and Evidence of
Legal Extortion 193
Jeffrey Haymond
vi Contents
11. Cy Pres and Its Predators 217
Charles N. W. Keckler
12. Licensing Lawyers: Failure in the Provision of Legal Services 235
Adam B. Summers
Bibliography 255
Notes on Contributors 283
Index 289
Illustrations
Tables
3.1 Average Judicial Quality Ranking by Selection
Process, 2004 40
3.2 Determinants of State Legal Liability Rankings 41
3.3 Comparison of Partisan vs. Nonpartisan Election States 42
3.4 Election Years vs. Nonelection Years 44
3.5 The Monthly Timing of Wrongful Convictions 46
5.1 States with Most and Least Convictions Per State
Government Employee 76
5.2 Summary Statistics 77
5.3 The Effect of Judicial Independence and Constitutional
Rigidity on Corruption in the United States 78
5.4 Correlation Coefficients between Corruption Indicators 83
5.5 Countries with Highest and Lowest Corruption Scores
According to Corruption TI Index 84
5.6 Correlation Coefficients between Judicial Independence
Indicators 84
5.7 Countries with Most and Least Independent Judiciaries
According to Judicial Independence (I) Index 85
5.8 Descriptive Statistics of Cross-Country Data 87
5.9 The Effect of Judicial Independence (I) on Corruption TI 90
5.10 The Effect of Judicial Independence (II) on Corruption TI 93
5.11 The Effect of Judicial Independence (III) on Corruption TI 95
5.12 The Effect of Constitutional Review on Corruption TI 96
5.13 The Effect of Judicial Independence on Corruption TI:
Pooled OLS, WLS, and Panel Estimations 98
6.1 Judicial Selection Mechanisms 107
6.2 Summary Statistics 114
6.3 Rates of Incarceration and Mean Sentence Lengths, by
Conviction Charge and Judicial Selection System 115
6.4 Predicted Effects of Variables Upon Incarceration and
(Conditional) Sentence Length 116
6.5 Incarceration and Sentence Length Models (Judges Grouped
by Initial Selection Method) 118
viii Illustrations
6.6 Incarceration and Sentence-length Models, Re-Classifying as
Elected Judges Those Appointed Judges Who Are Subject to
Retention Elections 119
10.1 2007 State Spending on Tobacco Prevention 212
FIGURE
4.1 Locus of Breakeven Values 68
Foreword
Robert D. Tollison
P
ublic choice and law and economics were distinct revolutions in economic
thought, expanding the economic method of homo economicus into areas
traditionally reserved for other disciplines. Both developments took place at
approximately the same time (the 1950s and 1960s), and many of the same
scholars participated in laying the theoretical foundations in both public
choice and law and economics. A partial listing in no particular order would
include Ronald Coase, James Buchanan, Gordon Tullock, Gary Becker,
Richard Posner, George Stigler, Henry Manne, Armen Alchian, Harold
Demsetz, and still others. Over time, as these new subdisciplines found
acceptance as “normal science,” the two areas of research evolved into courses
and research programs that were and largely remain independent of one
another. Recognizing that I am painting with a broad brush, the law and
economics subdiscipline grew into a largely normative enterprise of evaluat-
ing legal rules and institutions relative to some normative standard such as
economic efficiency. One branch of public choice produced what sometimes
seemed like never-ending and highly complicated analyses of voting rules
and other political institutions. But a second tradition of positive public
choice also emerged, in which economic methods were applied to politics
and political decision-making in order to understand how government
worked as opposed to how it “ought” to work. In the positive economic
approach, government is not decried as being “inefficient” in some sense,
but rather is seen as a purposeful enterprise organized, staffed, and run by
the children of Adam Smith and Bernard Mandeville.
The maintained hypothesis here is that law and economics shied away
from the positive economic analysis of law and its attendant actors and insti-
tutions. This is not to say that there have been zero contributions in this
vein. The point is simply that there is more than ample room for develop-
ment here, which brings me to this volume.
Edward Lo´pez and his co-authors have produced an original book that
contributes significantly to the positive economics of law and economics.
This to me is a valuable and useful undertaking, and it will hopefully stimu-
late additional work along these lines. Rather than, for example, looking at
law and economics as a critique of legal decision making vis-à-vis an eco-
nomic efficiency standard, these authors seek to model and explain/predict
