Table Of ContentRealism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in 
Iran’s Foreign Policy: 
The West, the State and Islam 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dissertation 
zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades 
der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät 
der Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen 
und University of St. Andrews 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
vorgelegt von 
 
Frau Laleh Gomari-Luksch 
 
aus Pasay City, Philippinen 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tübingen 
 
2017
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tag der mündlichen Prüfung:  09. Februar 2018 
Dekan:  Professor Dr. rer. soc. Josef Schmid 
1. Gutachter:  Prof. Dr. Thomas Diez 
2. Gutachter:  Prof. Dr. Gareth Stansfield 
 
2
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
For my family 
 
 
   
3
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
Contents
 
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 8 
List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 9 
1  Chapter One: Introduction and Related Literature Review .............................................. 10 
1.1  Central Thesis ........................................................................................................... 10 
1.2  Historical Background .............................................................................................. 12 
1.3  Perspectives on Iran’s Foreign Policy ...................................................................... 13 
1.3.1  Identity-based Perspectives .................................................................................. 14 
1.3.2  Interest-based Perspectives................................................................................... 19 
1.3.3  The Holistic Perspective Approach ...................................................................... 23 
2  Chapter Two: Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 27 
2.1  The English School Approach .................................................................................. 28 
2.2  The Three Traditions ................................................................................................ 31 
2.2.1  The Realist Tradition ............................................................................................ 32 
2.2.2  The Rationalist Tradition ..................................................................................... 35 
2.2.3  The Revolutionist Tradition ................................................................................. 37 
2.2.4  The Three Traditions Together............................................................................. 41 
2.3  The Contemporary International Society: Norms and Institutions .......................... 46 
2.3.1  Sovereignty ........................................................................................................... 50 
2.3.2  Non-intervention .................................................................................................. 52 
2.4  Institutions of International Society and the Three Traditions ................................. 54 
2.4.1  Diplomacy ............................................................................................................ 57 
2.4.2  Balance of Power ................................................................................................. 59 
2.4.3  International Law ................................................................................................. 61 
2.4.4  Great Power Management .................................................................................... 63 
2.4.5  War ....................................................................................................................... 64 
2.5  Joining the Three Traditions and the Classic Institutions ........................................ 67 
2.6  Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 67 
3  Chapter three: Methodology ............................................................................................. 69 
3.1  The Political Discourses of Iranian Statesmen ......................................................... 70 
3.2  Digital Data Gathering and Mixed-Methods Analysis ............................................. 72 
3.3  The Quantitative Phase of Analysis ......................................................................... 74 
3.3.1  Establishing the key phrases from the theory ....................................................... 74 
3.3.2  The Software: Compount ..................................................................................... 76 
3.3.3  Deriving the percentage values of each of the traditions ..................................... 78 
4
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
3.3.4  Advantages and Disadvantages of the Quantitative Analysis Method................. 79 
3.4  The Qualitative Phase of Analysis ........................................................................... 80 
3.4.1  Choice of Texts .................................................................................................... 80 
3.4.2 Potential Bias ........................................................................................................... 81 
3.4.3  Questions for the qualitative analysis phase ........................................................ 82 
3.4.4  Connecting the discourses with Iran’s foreign policy actions .............................. 82 
3.4.5  Advantages and Disadvantages of the Qualitative Analysis Method................... 83 
3.5  Limitations of the study ............................................................................................ 84 
4  Quantitative Analysis ....................................................................................................... 87 
4.1  General Overview of Sample ................................................................................... 87 
4.2  Speeches of the Presidents and The Foreign Minister ............................................. 92 
4.3  A closer look at the Datasets .................................................................................... 97 
4.3.1  The Khamenei Dataset ......................................................................................... 97 
4.3.2  The UN Dataset .................................................................................................. 102 
4.4  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 106 
5  Khamenei’s Foreign Policy Discourse ........................................................................... 108 
5.1  The West versus Islam: the realist pretext for revolutionism ................................. 110 
5.1.1  Hegemony of the West: The Evil realists ........................................................... 111 
5.1.2  The Power of the Islamic Revolution and sovereignty ...................................... 114 
5.2  Follow Iran – the champion of self-sovereignty and rationalism ........................... 116 
5.2.1  Iran’s Democracy and Diplomacy ...................................................................... 119 
5.2.2  Criminality of the Great Satan: breaking international law ............................... 122 
5.2.3  Iran’s leadership ambition .................................................................................. 126 
5.3  The Dawn of an Islamic Awakening and revolutionism ........................................ 128 
5.3.1  A United Islamic Front ....................................................................................... 131 
5.3.2  The Hajj as Training Grounds ............................................................................ 134 
5.3.3  The Attack of the West ....................................................................................... 136 
5.4  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 139 
6  Khatami’s Foreign Policy Discourse .............................................................................. 142 
6.1  Building bridges and the rationalist tradition ......................................................... 143 
6.3  Iran the Team-player and Peace-maker .................................................................. 149 
6.4  A New World Order: the thin line between rationalism and revolutionism .......... 154 
6.5  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 158 
7  Ahmadinejad’s Foreign Policy Discourse ...................................................................... 159 
7.1  Realism in the Unjust World Order ........................................................................ 161 
5
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
7.2  The immoral materialistic West ............................................................................. 163 
7.3  The myth of the Saviour: Mahmoud, the Supreme Leader of the UN ................... 166 
7.4  Democracy, solidarity and the rationalist tradition ................................................ 170 
7.5 Iran’s nuclear program and rationalism ....................................................................... 173 
7.6  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 177 
8  Rouhani’s Foreign Policy Discourse .............................................................................. 181 
8.1  Moderation, Democracy and the rationalist tradition ............................................. 182 
8.2 World Against Violence and Extremism (WAVE) ...................................................... 186 
8.3  Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) ...................................................... 188 
8.4  The relic of the realist and revolutionist tradition .................................................. 191 
8.5  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 193 
9  Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iran’s Foreign Policy ............................... 196 
9.1  Realism ................................................................................................................... 196 
9.1.1  The United States ............................................................................................... 197 
9.1.2  The Hezbollah and IRGC ................................................................................... 198 
9.1.3  Iraq ..................................................................................................................... 199 
9.1.4  Syria ................................................................................................................... 202 
9.1.5  Lebanon .............................................................................................................. 203 
9.1.6  Yemen ................................................................................................................ 204 
9.2  Rationalism ............................................................................................................. 205 
9.2.1  Trade: Iran’s main rationalist international activity ........................................... 206 
9.2.2  Iran’s Neighbours ............................................................................................... 210 
9.2.3  Iran and the Middle East .................................................................................... 216 
9.2.4  Iran and the World .............................................................................................. 220 
9.2.5  The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) ........................................... 224 
9.2.6  The Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) ............................................. 226 
9.3  Revolutionism ........................................................................................................ 227 
9.3.1  Islamic cosmopolitanism .................................................................................... 228 
9.3.2  Global Cosmopolitanism .................................................................................... 237 
9.4  Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 239 
10  Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 242 
10.1 Iran’s foreign policy explained................................................................................... 242 
10.2  Avenues for future research ................................................................................... 248 
10.3 Reflections .................................................................................................................. 251 
Bibliography ........................................................................................................................... 253 
6
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
Appendix 1: Keywords - Realism .......................................................................................... 272 
Appendix 2: Keywords - Rationalism .................................................................................... 274 
Appendix 3: Keywords – Revolutionism ............................................................................... 276 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
7
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
Acknowledgements 
 
It takes an entire village to raise a child – or to complete a dissertation with the countless 
intricacies and challenges attached to it affecting all aspects of a person’s life and mine is no 
exception. Without a big network of family, friends and colleagues, it would have been 
impossible for me to push through with this research for it involved excessive intellectual, 
emotional and physical strains that could not be offset alone.  
My academic development owes much to my supervisors Prof. Thomas Diez and Prof. Ali 
Ansari. I would like to express my gratitude for their guidance and patience, dedicating 
countless hours reading, discussing and giving me invaluable feedback on my thesis. I am 
indebted  to  the  Friedrich-Ebert  Foundation  for  providing  me  the  financial  support  and 
reassurance that I needed. Through them I could pursue research in St. Andrews, attend 
seminars and present my work at conferences across the globe. The academic community of 
both University of Tübingen and University of St. Andrews have been particularly supportive 
and helpful. Andreas Hasenclever, Ray Hinnebusch, Morten Valbjørn, Nick Rengger and Ryan 
Beasley deserve special mention for their generous insights, which have helped shape my 
research. 
I would like to thank my family starting with my husband, Stefan, for his unwavering support 
in all respects. My finishing this dissertation owes much to his care and attention giving me the 
strength to carry on despite all the hardships. I also want to thank my brothers Parviz, Syrus 
and Peiman for their moral support throughout these years and my father, Safar Ali Gomari for 
his faith in me. I’m extremely grateful to my dearest friends Lisa Gaufman, Aviva Guttmann 
and  Maryam  Aras  for  the  lengthy  discussions,  invaluable  comments  and  persistent 
encouragement especially during challenging times. 
Special thanks go to my friends Serveh Sharififar, Sarah Winkler, Umberto Zanolini, Anahita 
Aryan, Beste Isleyen, Valentina Churisova, Dmitry Chernobrov, Annette Schramm, Diamond 
Uy, Ching Kübel, Michael Kübel, Julia Palme, Carolin Echt, Svenja Vollmer, Matthias Leese, 
Lukas Kasten, Jorge Garzon, Rima Ostwani Najjar, Yannick Veilleux Lepage, Ellie Chaplin-
Ashton, Ameneh Mehvar and David Miles who were always willing to lend their ears and give 
me advice through the good and bad times. They all made my years as a PhD student enjoyable 
and fun. Many thanks to Letty Ortwein, Alice Ziegler, Martin Ziegler, Vu Thi Kim Phung, Bui 
Van Nga, Josefina Mariano and Ding Mariano for providing me with delicious meals and 
practical support during the writing-up phase. 
Last but certainly not the least, I want to thank my late mother, Divina Gomari, who inspired 
me to embark on this journey to defy all the odds.  
I am forever grateful for the support of everyone who accompanied me along the way.  
 
Laleh Gomari-Luksch 
Esslingen am Neckar 
7 October 2017 
8
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
List of Abbreviations 
 
 
AIOC    Anglo-Iranian Oil Company 
ASEAN  Association of Southeast Asian Nations   
BOP    Balance of Power 
CIA    Central Intelligence Agency (U.S.) 
DAC    Dialogue Among Civilizations 
ECHO   European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations 
ECO    Economic Cooperation Organization 
EU    European Union 
GCC    Gulf Cooperation Council 
GPM    Great Power Management 
IAEA    International Atomic Energy Agency 
ICDAC   International Centre of Dialogue Among Civilizations 
IICDCC   International Centre for Dialogue among Cultures and Civilizations 
IL    International Law 
IRGC    Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps 
IRP    Islamic Republican Party 
JCM     India-Iran Joint Commission Meeting 
JCPOA   Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action 
MOU    Memorandum of Understanding 
NAM    Non-Aligned Movement 
NPT    Non-Proliferation Treaty 
OIC    Organization of Islamic Cooperation 
RCD     Regional Cooperation for Development 
UN    United Nations 
UNGA   United Nations General Assembly 
UNSC   United Nations Security Council 
UNHCR  United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 
USD    United States Dollars 
WAVE   World Against Violence and Extremism 
WMD   Weapons of Mass Destruction 
   
9
Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism in Iranian Foreign Policy 
 
 
1  Introduction and Related Literature Review 
 
1.1  Central Thesis 
Iran’s association with terms such as ‘rogue state, pariah state or axis of evil’ had ascribed 
negative attributes to the country, which extends to the way Iran conducts its foreign affairs. 
This complicates international relations with Tehran as the political elites are regarded with 
heavy scepticism and their foreign policy as highly questionable. Suspicion regarding Iran’s 
real intent on having a functioning nuclear program is a case in point. Iranian leaders have 
persistently claimed it is solely for peaceful purposes. ‘Due to the important fatwa of its leader 
and its defence doctrine, [Iran] has never had the intention of producing a nuclear weapon’ and 
yet  mistrust  has  prevailed.1  I  developed  this  research  within  this  context  of  ambiguity 
surrounding Iranian foreign policy, wherein I answer the question: How can we explain the 
dynamics of Iran’s foreign policy? 
I argue that Iran’s foreign policy is consistent and is fundamentally realist with a revolutionist 
vision while the means are rationalist. Iranian statesmen, like most statesmen in the world, 
shape  their  policies  within  the  institutional  and  normative  parameters  of  the  modern 
international society of sovereign states adhering to the traditions of realism, rationalism and 
revolutionism. Iranian statesmen participating in international affairs utilize the institutions of 
international society and follow normative guidelines on how to effectively conduct themselves 
in  pursuing  their  foreign  policy  objectives.  These  objectives  are  simultaneously  realist, 
rationalist and revolutionist in nature showing the complexity and dynamism of Iran’s foreign 
policy. Iran’s foreign policy results from the interplay and balancing of the ‘traditions of 
thought’ of the international society by the Iranian statesmen, proving it is similar to foreign 
policies of all the other countries in the world. My analysis of Iran’s foreign policy relies on a 
different and multi-faceted approach as compared to most research on the topic while at the 
same time supporting the conclusion of most studies on Iranian foreign policy. I show that 
Iran’s foreign policy is consistent by providing a different understanding of it using the English 
School approach. Furthermore, I use both the quantitative and qualitative methods, taking into 
                                                 
1 Hassan Rouhani, “Address by Mr. Hassan Rouhani, President of the I.R. of Iran at the General Debate of the 
General Assembly of the UN (2015),” United Nations, accessed December 17, 2016, 
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=a/70/pv.13 
10
Description:rationalist and revolutionist traditions in Iran's foreign policy, making this . Ansari argues Iran's national identity is 'both modern in conception and