Table Of ContentPramod K. Nayar
Brand Postcolonial: ‘Third World’ Texts and the Global
Pramod K. Nayar
Brand Postcolonial:
‘Third World’ Texts 
and the Global
Managing Editor: Izabella Penier 
Language Editor: Adam Leverton 
Associate Editor: Adam Zmarzlinski
ISBN: 978-3-11-062563-9
e-ISBN: 978-3-11-062566-0
EPUB: 978-3-11-062582-0
© 2018 Pramod K. Nayar
Published by De Gruyter Poland Ltd, Warsaw/Berlin Part of Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com.
Managing Editor: Izabella Penier 
Associate Editor: Adam Zmarzlinski
Language Editor: Adam Leverton 
www.degruyter.com
Cover illustration: Getty Images
This book is for K. Narayana Chandran, 
teacher.
Contents
1  Introduction: The Postcolonial in/as the Global  10
1.1  The Postcolonial Author and Global Mobility  12
1.2  The Postcolonial Text in the Age of Global Reading  16
1.3  The Postcolonial and English Language  19
2  The Postcolonial Exotic: The Cult of Authenticity  22
2.1  Introducing the Postcolonial Exotic  23
2.2   Manufacturing Authenticity  28
2.3  The Literary Investment in Race and Ethnicity  31
2.4  Competing Authenticities  37
2.5  Conclusion  46
3  Re-Orientalism: The Indigene and the Subaltern  49
3.1  Re-Orientalism and (the) Postcolonial Remains   50
3.2  The Global Indigene  53
3.3  Decolonization, Land and the Indigene  54
3.4  Criterial and Relational Indigeneity   59
3.5  Alter/native Frames  63
3.6  The Global Subaltern  68
3.7  Subalternity and Citizenship  70
3.8  Postcolonial Subalternization  72
3.9  Conclusion  75
4   Thirdworldism: The Transnational Literary-Ethnic Chic   81
4.1  Authors, Authority and Global Appropriations  81
4.2  Authorial Self-fashioning in the Age of Global Cultural Empires  82
4.3  Market-fashioning and the Postcolonial Author as Ethnic Chic  89
4.4  Text and Textuality  91
4.5  Postcolonial Literature and Subjunctive Nationhood  107
4.6  Conclusion  109
5  Postcolonial Texts: Towards a New Humanism  111
5.1  The Biopolitical Regime in the Postcolonial Text  114
5.2  Postcolonial Literature and the Politics of Prejudice   120
5.3  Hope and Humanism  125
5.4  National and Natural Consciousness as Internationalism  131
5.5  Conclusion  136
6  Conclusion  140
6.1  The Postcolonial (as) Global Celebrity  140
6.2  Global Authors and their Homes/Homelands   141
6.3  Postcolonial Literary Tourism  143
6.4  The New ‘Hermeneutic of Intimacy’ and the Global Author  146
Bibliography  151
Index  161
Acknowledgements
Izabella Penier invited me to write this book for de Gruyter in its Open Access program. 
Since commissioning, Izabella has been an exemplary editor – discussing content, 
title and form with both enthusiasm and patience. To her, then, I owe a huge debt.
Nandini and Pranav, offered, as usual, their fullest support. My parents and par-
ents-in-law periodically query about health and stress-levels but more or less leave 
me to my ways. To this environment of affection, and care, I commit this work.
Teaching the postcolonial course – for a change! – in the MA program at the Uni-
versity of Hyderabad in 2017 enabled me to think through several of the themes dis-
cussed in the literatures that I read, and have found their way into this book in some 
form or the other.
Numerous sections of the book also grew out of several years of discussions 
with Anna Kurian, drawing upon but also extending ideas in my earlier books and 
essays on the postcolonial. Finessing these ideas with inputs from Anna was, as it has 
been for fifteen years now, exhilarating and illuminating. To Anna, again, therefore, 
unquantifiable gratitude. 
Nandana Dutta always manages to get me to think laterally, especially on the 
‘Theory question’. She engages with random ideas I throw at her, on WhatsApp no 
less, and with considerable gentleness urges me to ‘think more’. To her affection, 
I remain indebted. 
Friends such as Neelu, Angel, Ajeet, Soma, Ibrahim, Haneef, Josy, Vaishali, Prem-
lata, Walter are not people I meet regularly, and some I haven’t met for years: but their 
solicitous enquiries and good wishes constitute strongly supportive forces.
Molly Tarun, a.k.a, Chechu, deserves a special mention for her ‘how are you, little 
one?’ (all msgs in perfect grammatical agreement, even on WhatsApp!).
To Moumita Chowdhury for furnishing requested journal articles from assorted 
databases, even at short notice – thank you.
The DoE, UoH, as a space of work has been for many years a source of inspiration 
and shared knowledge – and this may be traced, with no deviations whatsoever, to 
K Narayana Chandran, whose supply of references and ideas has remained undimin-
ished. To KNC’s wisdom and generosity, then, like dozens of people around the world 
in this profession, I genuflect; for his affectionate support, I express my gratitude.
1  Introduction: The Postcolonial in/as the Global
In an early and justly influential essay, Arif Dirlik pronounced: ‘[Postcolonialism 
begins] when Third World intellectuals have arrived in First World academe’ (1994: 
329). Dirlik went on to make this argument about postcolonialism as a field of study:
It is intended, therefore, to achieve an authentic globalization of cultural discourses by the 
extension globally of the intellectual concerns and orientations originating at the central sites 
of Euro-American cultural criticism and by the introduction into the latter of voices and sub-
jectivities from the margins of earlier political and ideological colonialism that now demand a 
hearing at those very sites at the center. The goal, indeed, is no less than to abolish all distinc-
tions between center and periphery as well as all other “binarisms” that are allegedly a legacy 
of colonial(ist) ways of thinking and to reveal societies globally in their complex heterogeneity 
and contingency. (329) 
Dirlik argues that 
there is a parallel between the ascendancy in cultural criticism of the idea of postcoloniality and 
an emergent consciousness of global capitalism in the 1980s and, second, that the appeals of the 
critical themes in postcolonial criticism have much to do with their resonance with the concep-
tual needs presented by transformations in global relationships caused by changes within the 
capitalist world economy. (331)
There is, in Dirlik’s argument, the suspicion that the postcolonial is in some ways 
complicit with the new global capitalism and refuses to acknowledge its origins 
within this global system. There is no critique, argues Dirlik, of the social, political 
and economic conditions of global capitalism by postcolonialism because it does 
not recognize that the new forms of domination are merely reconfigurations of older 
forms (331).
On the one hand, Dirlik draws attention to the link between the postcolonial, or 
the formerly colonized nations of Asia, South America, Africa, the former settler col-
onies of Canada and Australia, and the global, but on the other he does not see how 
the postcolonial affects and intervenes in the circuit of culture, a circuit which is not 
wholly given over to the unevenness of economics alone. A founding assumption of 
this book is that the postcolonial text critically informs global debates about ethnic 
identity and authenticity, the commodification of this identity, cultural imperialism, 
Human Rights and the redefinitions of the human, among others. That is, the postco-
lonial text – and there is no one prototype of standardized postcolonial text, so I use 
the term to gesture at a wide variety of literary fiction produced from the former col-
onies – is not a simple derivative of global discourses but an active force that shapes 
these discourses. 
This book examines the sites, processes and debates that generate the ‘postcolo-
nial aura’ (the title of Dirlik’s original essay and subsequent book) or what this book 
treats as ‘brand postcolonial’, in the circulation of global culture. The ‘auratic’ nature 
 © 2018 Pramod K. Nayar
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.