Table Of ContentAnatomy of 
  
Failure
Also available from Bloomsbury:
Alain Badiou: Live Theory, Oliver Feltham 
Being and Event, Alain Badiou, translated by Oliver Feltham
Libertarian Anarchy, Gerard Casey
Anatomy of 
  
Failure
Philosophy and Political Action
OLIVER FELTHAM
LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY
Bloomsbury Academic
An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  50 Bedford Square  175 Fifth Avenue
  London  New York
  WC1B 3DP  NY 10010
  UK  USA
www.bloomsbury.com
First published 2013
© Oliver Feltham, 2013
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or  
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,  
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or  
retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers.
Oliver Feltham has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and  
Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Author of this work.
No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting  
on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication  
can be accepted by Bloomsbury Academic or the author.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
EISBN: 978-1-4411-9954-6
           
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Feltham, Oliver.
Anatomy of failure : philosophy and political action / Oliver Feltham.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references (p.   ) and index.
SBN 978-1-4411-5864-2 (pbk.) – ISBN 978-1-4411-6088-1 (hardcover) –  
ISBN 978-1-4411-6512-1 (epub) – ISBN 978-1-4411-9954-6 (ebook pdf)   
I
1. Political science–Philosophy.  I. Title.
JA71.F46 2013
320.01–dc23
2012030173
Typeset by Newgen Imaging Systems Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India
COnTEnTs
 
Acknowledgements  vi
List of abbreviations  vii
1   Thrasymachus versus Socrates on  
 
philosophy and political action  1
2   1647 – The history of the Leveller-agitators  
 
and the New Model Army  29
3   Hobbes’ and Locke’s metaphysics: Substances  
 
no longer act, institutions act  87
4   Hobbes and Locke on religious conflict:  
 
When institutions act, subjects act  131
5   Hobbes and Locke on politics:  
 
Sovereign action and contractual action  181
6   Unveiling the forgotten model:  
 
The Leveller-agitators on joint action  251
Notes  271
Bibliography  283
  Index  287
ACknOwLEdgEMEnTs
 
This book is dedicated to Alma and Giulio, fruit of joint action, 
partners who join new to old.
Many friends and colleagues have aided me in the long gestation 
of this book, whether it was in a brief exchange at a conference 
or through continual collegial support. Some of them have prob-
ably forgotten what they said when I unveiled this project to them, 
but all contributions were valuable, and kept me going at different 
points of the voyage. Having said that, the result is no one’s fault 
but my own. In particular I would like to thank Bernard Aspe, 
Bruno Besana, Vanessa Brito, Andrew Buchanan, Lorenzo Chiesa, 
Justin Clemens, Mladen Dolar, Duncan Fairfax, Alexis Feltham, 
Bryony  Feltham,  Chris  Feltham  and  Val  Feltham,  Tony  Fry, 
Geoffrey Gilbert, Peter Hallward, Quentin Meillassoux, Alberto 
Toscano, Steven Sawyer, Jelica Sumic Riha, Frank Ruda, Cameron 
Tonkinwise,  Tzuchien  Tho  and  Ben  Tunstall.  The  American 
University of Paris supported me by means of a research course 
release in the fall of 2010, and by providing a diligent research 
assistant, Sophia Ben-Achour, for one semester. Sally Murray, my 
librarian, did not give up on securing access to the Early English 
Books Online database. Bloomsbury have demonstrated inestima-
ble patience and good will. Finally I thank my first reader, Barbara 
Formis – if it had not been for that first conversation about praxis 
in the café at the Bibliothèque Nationale Française, there would be 
  neither book, nor children, nor us.
LIsT OF 
ABBREVIATIOns
Leveller-agitator tracts from the Thomason Tracts collection
  AP  An Agreement of the People
  CA  The Case of the Army Truly Stated
  SE  Ahe Solemn Engagement
  PP  Putney Projects
Books
  B  Thomas Hobbes, Behemoth or the Long Parliament
  C  Thomas Hobbes, On the Citizen
  E  Baruch Spinoza, Ethics
  EHU   John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human 
Understanding
  L  Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan
  LT  John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration
  ML   Martin Luther, Martin Luther: Selections from His 
Writings
  PL   A. S. P. Woodhouse, Puritanism & Liberty  
(the Putney Debates)
  R  Plato, The Republic
  ST  John Locke, Second Treatise on Government
CHAPTER ONE
  
Thrasymachus versus 
Socrates on philosophy and 
political action
Origins
  
Thrasymachus is angry. He was allowed to figure in one of the 
grand opening scenes of philosophy only to disappear into the 
wings, a mere extra, yet he had come to declare a truth: that there 
is no justice, no Idea of the good that might direct action. What 
is called ‘justice’ is always what suits the stronger: ‘in all cities the 
  same thing is just, namely what is good for the ruling authority’.1 
Power determines what is said to be right. Two millennia before 
Hobbes or Marx, Thrasymachus insists that a theory of action 
has to take into account political power and the possibility of jus-
tice being fiction. But Socrates and his acolytes are not ready; for 
them this would result in a space of action without any orientation, 
which is absurd. They overwhelm him with reproaches of incivil-
ity and arguments that beg the question, presuming the truth of 
the very theory he is attacking. He gives ground reluctantly not 
able to fully articulate and defend what is actually the germ of an 
entirely different philosophy of action. And on the way he offers 
the only complete diagnosis of Socrates’ tactics to be found in the 
Platonic opus: Socrates is not an ironist, but a trickster. Athens’ 
self-appointed moral critic is stung by the attack; in response, his 
sarcasm is violent, his rhetoric cheap and arguments rough and 
flawed. Yet Thrasymachus is reduced to sulking and then silence. 
After Book I of The Republic, we hear no more of him apart from a