[Advanced constitutional law : comparative, remedial and security issues]

2004·0.26 MB·English

by  Roach, Kent

DIALOGUE BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES
IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
VOLUME 1
PROESSOR KENT ROACH
Faculty of Law
University of Toronto
2004
DEC - 5 2003
FACiilii . Li
TC^GrTO
DIALOGUE BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES
IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
VOLUME 1
PROESSOR KENT ROACH
Faculty of Law
University of Toronto
2004
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2018 with funding from
University of Toronto
https://archive.org/details/advancedconstitu01roac_2
Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures in Comparative Perspective
Volume I
1. Introduction to Dialogue
Alexander Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch, 2nd ed (1986), pp. 1, 16-28, 68-71 . 1
Michael Perry, The Constitution in the Courts (1994), pp. 192-204 . 12
Guido Calabresi, “Foreword: Antidiscrimination and Constitutional Accountability"
(1991) 105 Harv.L.Rev. 80, pp. 719-747 . 19
Etienne Mureinik, “A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights"
(1994) 10 S.A.J.H.R. 31, pp. 31-34. 48
David Dyzenhaus, “Law as Justification: Etienne Mureinik's Conception of
Legal Culture” (1998) 14 S.A.J.H.R. 11, pp. 31-37. 51
Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001), chs. 12, 13 (Refer to Book)
2. Dialogue in Comparative Perspective
Ran Hirschl, “Looking Sideways, Looking Backwards, Looking Forwards: Judicial
Review vs. Democracy in Comparative Perspective” (2000) 34 Univ.of Richmond
L.R. 415, pp. 434-441 . 55
Mark Tushnet, “Judicial Activism or Restraint in a Section 33 World" (Winter 2003)
53 U.T.L.J. 89. 59
Aharon Barak, “Forward: A Judge on Judging, The Role of a Supreme Court in a
Democracy” (2002) 116 Harv.L.Rev. 16, pp. 116-138. 67
Mark Tushnet, “Judicial Review of Legislation” in Cane and Tushnet, The Oxford
Handbook of Legal Studies (2003). 90
Keith Ewing, “Human Rights” in Cane and Tushnet, pp.306-322 . 100
Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs. 2, 4 (Refer to Book)
3. Dialogue in Canada
Paul Weiler, “Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version”
(Fall 1984) 18 J. of Law Reform... 110
Hon. Beverly McLachlin, “Charter Myths” (1999) 33 U.B.C.L.R. 23. 132
Peter Hogg and Allison Bushell, “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and
Legislatures” (1997) 35 O.H.L.J. 75. 140
Christopher Manfredi and James Kelly, “Six Degrees of Dialogue: A Response to Hogg
and Bushell” (1999) 37 O.H.L.J. 513. 156
Peter Hogg and Allison Thornton, “Reply to 'Six Degrees of Dialogue’” (1999)
37 O.H.L.J. 529 .. 164
F.L. Morton, “Dialogue or Monologue?” (April 1999) Policy Options.. 169
Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs 1,5 (Refer to Book)
4. Dialogue under the Canadian Charter
Kent Roach The Supreme Court on Trial (2001) chs. 10, 14. (Refer to Book)
Vriendv. Alberta [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493 . 173
R v. Mills [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668 . 184
Same v. Canada (2002), 218 D.L.R. (4th) 577; 2002 SCC 68. 195
R v. Hall (2002), 217 D.L.R. (4th) 536; 2002 SCC 64 . 205
Halpern v. Canada June 10, 2003 .... 223
Department of Justice Press Release .... 269
Janet Hiebert “From Equality Rights to Same Sex Marriage” Policy Options
October 2003 . 272
Christopher Manfredi “Same-Sex Marriage and the Notwithstanding Clause”
Policy Options October 2003 ... 279
F.L. Morton “Can Judicial Supremacy Be Stopped?” ibid... 283
5. Dialogue under the American Bill of Rights
Kent Roach, The Supreme Court on Triad eh.2 (Refer to Book)
Mark Tushnet, “The Flag-Burning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution” (1990) 61
Univ. of Colorado L.Rev. 39 . 288
Charles Tiefer, “The Flag-Burning Controversy of 1989-1990: Congress’ Valid Role
in Constitutional Dialogue” (1992) 29 Harv. Journal on Legislation 357 . 296
Dickerson v. United States (2000) 120 S.Ct. 2326 . 318
Carissima Mathen “Constitutional Dialogues in Canada and the United States”
(2003) 14N.J.C.L.403.... 334
Cass Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court
(1999), ch. 2 & conclusion... 367
Kent Roach, “American Constitutional Theory for Canadians (and the Rest of the World)”
(2002) 52 U.T.L.J. 503 ..... 381
6. Dialogue in New Zealand and the United Kingdom
Paul Rishworth et al. The New Zealand Bill of Rights (2003), pp.l 16-137, 163-167,
81 1-838 ... 391
Text of New Zealand Bill of Rights, ss.1-6, in Rishworth et al, pp.839-840 . 419
Human Rights Act 1998 (UK), ss. 1-8, 10, 14-17, 19. 421
Philip Plowden and Kevin Kerrigan, Advocacy and Human Rights (2002),pp.43-46,
175-193, 197-212, 224-232 .... 428
Poplar Housing v. Donoghue [2002] Q.B. 48 (C.A.) ... 450
R. v. A. (No. 2) [2002] 1 A.C. 45 (H.L.). 453
R. v. Lambert [2002] 2 A.C. 545 (H.L.). 463
R v. Offen [2001] 1 Cr. App. R. 24 (C.A.). 471
In re S (Minors) [2002] 2 A.C. 291 (H.L.). 476
International Transport Roth GmbH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2003| Q.B. 728 (C.A.). . 482
Hooper v Secretary of State for Work anil Pensions | 20021 l J.K.H.R.R. 785
(H.C.J.Q.B.).... 487
The Queen v. London Borough of Enfield [2002] H.L.R. 38 (H.C.J.Q.B.)
Bell ExpressVu v. Rex 212 D.L.R. (4th) 1; [20021 2 S.C.R. 559. 497
7. Dialogue in India and South Africa
Constitution of India, articles 13 & 32 . 497
S.P. Sathe, Judicial Activism in India (2002). pp. 195-248 . 499
Kent Roach, Constitutional Remedies in Canada (1994), ss. 13.300-13.360 . 527
Constitution of South Africa, articles 36-39, 172 . 530
Ziyad Motala and Cyril Ramaphosa, Constitutional Law (2002), pp. 83-92 . 533
Ease v. South Africa (Minister of Safety and Security) [1997] S.A.J. No. 7 (S.A.C.C.). 543
Hoff nan v. South African Airways [2000] S.A.J. No. 53 (S.A.C.C.). 583
National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v. Minister of Home Affairs [1999]
(3) B.C.L.R. 280(C)....... 600
S. v. Manamela [2000] S.A.J. No. 8 (S.A.C.C.). 616
S. v. Ntuli [1995] S.A.J. No. 13 (S.A.C.C.). 644
S. v. Ntuli [1995] S.A.J. No. 6 (S.A.C.C.). 651