Canadian municipal and planning law

22 Pages·1999·0.79 MB·English

by  Makuch, Stanley M

Y
R
A
R
B
LI
W
A
L
N
KI
S
A
L MUNICIPAL AND PLANNING LAW
A
R
O
B
Casebook
STANLEY M. MAKUCH
PART 11
FACULTY OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
,
•
i-.MOis.iiN LAW LIBRARY
. UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
MUNICIPAL AND PLANNING LAW
Casebook
STANLEY M. MAKUCH
PART II
FACULTY OF LAW
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
e"l 4. ^ • \ y/iv ,M
S':® ■orMorxGT 10 V '* iJiHavinU":
' . ' J
i •V
» ‘j
.
rt
A •<'
- . ’ • » <v^
»■ , ■^•« Hfc ' ^*’ '
, .. «
• r
^ : t: ^ h
. ,'■.,< ►rv’t};
‘ 'V -
* «»d
■'. r ’ ' ' ;Jy ' * ’*
0
i ^
■ -- , ‘ w.. ‘l- -'*
’ . ■
i ' t IV
• V‘
r .
:i«-.'S’>X-r-
.if-
” . i** * ♦ »
,'^jKfrif^t *' a
• - , ■ ,
'1 w •-
•> /
.
V;
t** .'•
4 .
» •
^ • I V •
... ■ •V*‘V- .
’•,.%‘t^; r.': '• -f* ■
5
-' ■^'•r • -xJ’.'<;l ''I* '■' ■■
-i-
. ' '^
5
<■
,1
V , .
/
• t *t
■iA>*-r'.’a
A-y'/.r' Vi
c,;^. , ,
MUNICIPAL AND PLANNING LAW
Table of Contents
PART II
Chapter 5
Introduction to Planning
Introduction. 1
W.I. Goodman, ed. "Principles and Practice of Urban Planning". 2
S. Proudfoot, "Private Wants and Public Needs: The Regulation of Land Use in the
Metropolitan Toronto Area" . 9
Chapter 6
The Official Plan
Introduction
Ontario Economic Council, "Subject to Approval". 11
Conformity
Re Cadillac Development Corporation and City of Toronto (1974) 1 O.R. (2d) 21 (H.C.). 15
The Limits of Official Plans
Re Official Plan of Richmond Hill Planning Area (1980), 13 M.P.L.R. 87 (O.M.B.). 20
Re City of Brampton Planning Area Offiicial Plan Amendment 75 (1982), 14 O.M.B.R.
482 (O.M.B.). 21
Upper Tier Municipality Official Plans
Campeau Corporation v. Township of Gloucester (1978), 6 M.P.L.R. 290 (O.H.C.) . 23
The Provincial Role in Planning
White, "Ontario’s Land Use Legislation" . 26
(i)
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2018 with funding from
University of Toronto
https://archive.org/details/canadianmunicipa02maku
Chapter 7
The Private Control of Land Uses
Introduction. 31
Restrictive Covenants. 32
Re Sekretow and City of Toronto (1973), 33 D.L.R. (3d) 257 (O.C.A.)
Building Schemes
Hyett, "Restrictive Covenants: An Appraisal of Building Schemes".37
McGregor et al. v. Boyd Builders Ltd. et al. (1965) 54 D.L.R. (2d) 112 (O.H.C.) .40
Modification of Restrictive Covenants.42
Nuisance
Bottom V. Ontario Leaf Tobacco Co. Ltd., [1935] O.R. 204 (C.A.).43
Fiss, "The Supreme Court - Forward".45
Rogers, "The Growing Significance of Environmental Issues in the Development
Approval Process".46
Chapter 8
Zoning and Land Use Control
Introduction to Zoning.48
Introduction
Boston Globe, "Houston Looks for A Heart".48
Makuch, "Zoning: Avenues of Reform" .49
The Scope of the Zotung Power .51
Exclusionary Zoning and the Scope of the Zoning Power
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. Ohio. S.C.U.S. 1926. 272 U.S. 365 . 51
The Bell Case.57
Re Hutterian Brethren Church of Eagle Creek and Rural Municipality of
Eagle Creek (1983), 21 M.P.L.R. 108 (Sask. C.A.).72
(u)
■^T /-?>■ -vV.,'^
>
V. J
s-’s
,. ■'?■'• ^-4-' ■: ^t.- . W.‘Jf • *J -v /
• ' ■- _ t,'»»|.HCli A fr.
’"i -n.
i
'0'iU *» ^ 4T '
<1
. 1 t • •
V* ' • ■“ - » r.-
ff X)?
*it^' Tt'' i
• » «
j. 4 ,
■ J1^
nV ' '>»rvn>r.^d
i II (..' :>:0) ^ vrtMp.
.•i
*c%
■-
■f' ■• -■ ■ A'-'i'.fts
I EL. < ' '■. .i ’
j/HjitiMri Jn^un^'iA H;.*H'
-t
.' -
\ 'j K 4^) '■| ( .51. : ■ •*5J*V . -siv .*. Vi - t)r>J
. ,ti4• y,A”*"^ .i i.:*i; i/)! Ii> ;♦ ih***-!!)'
<i
o:-U»f**<!1
. . Ti=i ’^■» ^' *5 51 f. ! ,ia,U tO • ^vU
I It
^ ,1 *- fl[^u/2 tfi' •‘--H
csf ^
iR^rjolrt.aCf >if* u «>«• 1 ’^ynrl tfi T>ttjnft*vQi'. u«n vovO juT* H
<?* * -J I - I I f -
^ V-
.tf
Ui*.ioait> sw’i loit i b/^ v»V'"lX
I ' liT! aITi'. ". l
n ;
' t t
jUL»> L>oi
Ht. • V*. iii/r b'M^i oh' k' ftr a‘
* •*"»
... ‘'uQa iV -I ^“a. • V, i^niwnSk* (JjWkr.J’t* *x J
* « • «
*
»• ■? ■% -i. ^ ^
# A ..■■:'■*
■fc . , . . , . - , . , J., . »i , . • *■ ‘*V ^auwt.. usU io .>3co^ /5JT
tt
_ ^1 ■ ..V- .i. 4
^ >ii; :./w<» lOblf/A
A./ ’V.-'V'""'
'iV' ^ ;^.,U,>>;?- .UtT'» .li\ ' ''>!
- x\
, I »■’
* i r
• •
• )
I.
* . f /.i\tv^.A,.l' ii •*?» .<> vV^t 1 V akavitti^^Jk *%
•» •' • # • • *^1 i u... ‘ Al’> ' "j J? J S .Ht *,i, '■. ^'viO tinu ^
•jll •
4* , i
-i., .. ^
_. ;| ML
-.%!
Discrimination and Zomng
dry of Toronto v. Mendelbaum, [1932] O.R. 552 (H.C.).73
City of Verdun v. Sun Oil Co. Ltd., [1951] S.C.R. 222 . 75
Scarborough Township v. Bondi (1959), 18 D.L.R. (2d) 161 (S.C.C.).76
Bad Faith
Re Cadillac Development Corp. and City of Toronto (1974), 1 O.R. (2d) 21 (H.C.79) ....
H.G. Winton v. Corporation of the Borough of North York (1978), 6 M.P.L.R. 1
(Ont. Div. Ct.) . 81
The Administration of Zoning By-Laws
Polai City of Toronto (1972), 28 D.L.R. (3d) 638 (S.C.C.). 83
V.
Prohibiting All Uses
R. Gibson Kx Parte Cromiller, [1959] O.W.N. 254 (Ont. H.C.) . 85
V.
Corporation of The City of Coquitlam v. Karamanolis (1978), 3 M.P.L.R. 112 (B.C.S.C.) .... 86
Planning and Land Value
The Common Law Position
Belfast Corporation v. O.D. Cars Ltd., [1960] A.C. 490 (H.L.) . 88
The Current Canadian Position
Regina Auto Court v. City of Regina (1958), 25 W.W.R. 167 (Sask. Q.B.). 94
Re Simpson and City of Vancouver (1977), 65 D.L.R. (3d) 669 (S.C.C.) . 96
Hauff et al. v. City of Vancouver (1981), 15 M.P.L.R. 8 (B.C.C.A.). 101
The Charter
The Queen in Right of New Brunswick v. Fisherman's Wharf Ltd. (1982),
7 C.R.R. 46 (N.B.C.A.). 104
Negligence
Welbridge Holdings Ltd. v. Metropolitan Corporation of Greater Winnipeg (1970), 22 D.L.R.
(3d) 470 (S.C.C.) . 107
< ■ ,r,i l'.».:v
^" kvi . .-\ :4'. i
• “ ■'■ ■•' .' ‘J '* V
.. ^ -’4*^ * '.. -#«c*
> * ’• t •■f^'T
...» * »■■ • . ..„.• f r 4 '
•b-
* ’ ' .^ •» - ' ^ >.'l '
. -- *u'/lA' jPl O ^-i^'■'"^uy yvA -
ty ..
S .*’■ 'S' ^ ^ ' '
V.' ' ‘V r»:iCirt.,r . ;n_,. vyv aH
• . •' 4
. -V ^ .. (.'^3;^^ r^: itSSi ,;i.j n A.
'* "‘■j' -■■ r-'" ^ »>-)
■•J,
' >■ -vf''
' '■ . V '
t,, 't ‘A.rjwiT’’ 'Y^ ‘t>*i Wi) 't'* .1*'- V''’!f'?‘V ' ‘J’^*-*'*'**'’’
» . “ ** * . , ' p' •'_
i ..> i,‘VM 'c r'9\ t J.is'f * i> .45.H
'* ** ■ • ‘ - •'.5'’> i' '. *0>
• \
• ' •* T 1# ’ ‘ • ■ ^{v' ♦ ’ *
>V('4. > >•’! '.‘!"*.r*% * * 'T.* c»*4:M*Mi4All, o T
‘ ■■ •.♦;■ .
' 4 J jJ f~ , *■' » nt * •
I
.?;• “, »‘i» .1 jl/ iiM
f
iu
■fy .,\1 .,. . AF -^SMWK# ^ .»4.vi /# .5^
1
, i .' ^ .V e O H» - ‘ ^ ^ w i ) • V \w»»'W^>l - v» . . j ..n V «’ ..i»<t«wvO
li-b;*/ I-n-t' i*nA
1 - ■•* ff.
* *■ »'
^ *r;rtM^ '•' *'«J niTT )
■f'
■f ■
^ i ’•♦AO If . \x\X At.'l .CJ ’♦ P',A* ’ ♦v ' •
■•.r» ’# *1’..•.! '^» 1 •*4
(v»ii*'>' 'i -'Mihun,'^ t » -It* ai»T_
( ^
try (,»i 0 ^ ^ ^ » '•• ''A V' •■' ^
I <N!» fUli A. i.A3 'VAi \rifrV:i V»^»v i>
V "
, . i.0.>O'?i S !v i u>*)
' \
}
\ ( ■• i an ■
♦ I
) 'i.X \,«4i\^ ’ if - ^ '/ V> u.* t n j -K*
, ' . ;» .4, I.Au3 >*1^ H>>* i* ^
4* :^r £:
^r _0 "
i-i . * ..:Vjl'.
■t.,'. <4 11 iOVOn -.v.vi^^^.aolfv. .‘.■' ■’ "'• .*4<j«i'''-W'. .v.jcvtJk -JvdwnAhi^
^ ■ • ., .. O'
! ■ !
i. ♦ m.
1 i ’ A 'v*l^
'jS!
» —A •- ■' ^■^ ' f
|4i*.
MM
fll. .>. I*