Kantian ethics : value, agency, and obligation

295 Pages·2015·1.63 MB·English

by  Stern

Kantian Ethics

Kantian Ethics
Value, Agency, and Obligation
Robert Stern
1
3
GreatClarendonStreet,Oxford,OX26DP,
UnitedKingdom
OxfordUniversityPressisadepartmentoftheUniversityofOxford.
ItfurtherstheUniversity’sobjectiveofexcellenceinresearch,scholarship,
andeducationbypublishingworldwide.Oxfordisaregisteredtrademarkof
OxfordUniversityPressintheUKandincertainothercountries
#inthisvolumeRobertStern2015
Themoralrightsoftheauthorhavebeenasserted
FirstEditionpublishedin2015
Impression:1
Allrightsreserved.Nopartofthispublicationmaybereproduced,storedin
aretrievalsystem,ortransmitted,inanyformorbyanymeans,withoutthe
priorpermissioninwritingofOxfordUniversityPress,orasexpresslypermitted
bylaw,bylicenceorundertermsagreedwiththeappropriatereprographics
rightsorganization.Enquiriesconcerningreproductionoutsidethescopeofthe
aboveshouldbesenttotheRightsDepartment,OxfordUniversityPress,atthe
addressabove
Youmustnotcirculatethisworkinanyotherform
andyoumustimposethissameconditiononanyacquirer
PublishedintheUnitedStatesofAmericabyOxfordUniversityPress
198MadisonAvenue,NewYork,NY10016,UnitedStatesofAmerica
BritishLibraryCataloguinginPublicationData
Dataavailable
LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2015936892
ISBN 978–0–19–872229–8
Printedandboundby
CPIGroup(UK)Ltd,Croydon,CR04YY
LinkstothirdpartywebsitesareprovidedbyOxfordingoodfaithand
forinformationonly.Oxforddisclaimsanyresponsibilityforthematerials
containedinanythirdpartywebsitereferencedinthiswork.
Contents
Acknowledgements vii
ListofAbbreviations ix
Introduction 1
Part I. Themes from Kant’s Ethics
1. Kant,MoralObligation,andtheHolyWill 15
2. ConstructivismandtheArgumentfromAutonomy 40
3. TheValueofHumanity:ReflectionsonKorsgaard’s
TranscendentalArgument 57
4. MoralScepticismandAgency:KantandKorsgaard 74
5. MoralScepticism,Constructivism,andtheValueofHumanity 90
6. Does‘Ought’Imply‘Can’?AndDidKantThinkItDoes? 106
7. WhyDoesOughtImplyCan? 122
Part II. Ethics after Kant
8. OnHegel’sCritiqueofKant’sEthics:Beyondthe‘Empty
Formalism’Objection 139
9. DoesHegelianEthicsRestonaMistake? 157
10. ‘MyStationanditsDuties’:SocialRoleAccountsofObligation
inGreenandBradley 171
11. TheEthicsoftheBritishIdealists:PerfectionismafterKant 190
12. RoundKantorthroughHim?OnJames’sArgumentsforFreedom,
andtheirRelationtoKant’s 202
13. ‘DutyandVirtueAreMoralIntroversions’:OnLøgstrup’sCritique
ofMorality 224
14. DivineCommandsandSecularDemands:OnDarwallonAnscombe
on‘ModernMoralPhilosophy’ 243
Bibliography 265
Index 281

Acknowledgements
Thepapersinthiscollectionalsoappearinthefollowingplaces,andwherenecessary
Iamgratefulforpermissiontoreprinttherelevantmaterial:
Chapter1: ‘Kant, Moral Obligation, and the Holy Will’, in Mark Timmons and
Sorin Baiasu (eds.), Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretative Essays (Oxford:
OxfordUniversityPress,2013),pp.125–52
Chapter2:‘ConstructivismandtheArgumentfromAutonomy’,inJamesLenman
and Yonatan Shemmer (eds.), Constructivism in Practical Philosophy (Oxford:
OxfordUniversityPress,2012),pp.119–37
Chapter3: ‘The Value of Humanity: Reflections on Korsgaard’s Transcendental
Argument’, in Joel Smith and Peter Sullivan (eds.), Transcendental Philosophy and
Naturalism(Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,2011),pp.74–95
Chapter4:‘MoralScepticismandAgency:KantandKorsgaard’,Ratio,23(2010),
pp.451–74
Chapter5: ‘Moral Scepticism, Constructivism, and the Value of Humanity’, in
Carla Bagnoli (ed.), Constructivism in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press,2013),pp.22–40
Chapter6:‘Does“Ought”Imply“Can”?AndDidKantThinkItDoes?’Utilitas,16
(2004),pp.42–61
Chapter7: ‘Why Does Ought Imply Can?’, in Marcel van Ackeren and Michael
Kühler (eds.), The Limits of Moral Obligation: Moral Demandingness and Ought
ImpliesCan(Abingdon:Routledge,2016),pp.100–15
Chapter8:‘OnHegel’sCritiqueofKant’sEthics:Beyondthe“EmptyFormalism”
Objection’, in Thom Brooks (ed.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Oxford: Wiley-
Blackwell,2012),pp.73–99
Chapter9: ‘Does Hegelian Ethics Rest on a Mistake?’ in Italo Testa and Luigi
Ruggiu (eds.), I That Is We, We That is I: Contemporary Perspectives on Hegel
(Leiden:Brill,2015)
Chapter10: ‘“My Station and its Duties”: Social Role Accounts of Obligation in
Green and Bradley’, in Nicholas Boyle, Liz Disley, and Karl Ameriks (eds.), The
Impact of Idealism: Volume 1 Philosophy and Natural Sciences (Cambridge:
CambridgeUniversityPress,2013),pp.299–322
Chapter11:‘TheEthicsoftheBritishIdealists:PerfectionismafterKant’,inSasha
Golub and Jens Timmermann (ed.), The Cambridge History of Ethics (Cambridge:
CambridgeUniversityPress,2015)
Chapter12:‘RoundKantorThroughHim?OnJames’sArgumentsforFreedom,
andtheirRelationtoKant’s’,inGabrieleGavaandRobertStern(eds.),Pragmatism,
Kant,andTranscendentalPhilosophy(Abingdon:Routledge,2015)
viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Chapter13:‘“DutyandVirtueAreMoralIntroversions”:OnLøgstrup’sCritique
of Morality’, in Hans Fink and Robert Stern (eds.), What is Ethically Demanded?
Essays on Knud Ejler Løgstrup’s ‘The Ethical Demand’ (Notre Dame: Notre Dame
UniversityPress,2016)
Chapter14:‘DivineCommandsandSecularDemands:OnDarwallonAnscombe
on“ModernMoralPhilosophy”’,Mind123(2014),pp.1095–122
Manypeoplehavehelpedmetoproducetheworkcollectedinthisvolume;some(but
Ifearnotall)arethankedintherelevantpapers.ColleaguesandstudentsatSheffield
have also been particularly supportive, as has my family, for which I am extremely
gratefuloncemore.ThanksalsogotoPeterMomtchiloffofOUPforagainsupport-
ing another collection of my papers, which is a kind of companion volume to my
earlierHegelianMetaphysics(Stern2009).
Iwouldliketodedicatethisvolumetothememoryofmyfather,agoodman.
List of Abbreviations
Ingeneral,Ihaveusedtheauthor/datesystemofreferencing.However,inthecaseof
KantandHegel,Ihaveusedasystemofabbreviations(seebelow),wheredetails of
theworksaregivenintheBibliography.
Works by Kant
References are given to one of the following translations, followed by references to
thevolumeandpagenumberoftheAkademieeditionofKant’sworks(Kant1900–),
except for referencesto CPR,which are given to the pagination of the first (A) and
second(B)editionsinthestandardmanner.
CBHH ConjecturalBeginningofHumanHistory,translatedbyAllenWood,in
Kant2007:160–75
CJ CritiqueofthePowerofJudgment,translatedbyPaulGuyerandEric
Matthews,inKant2000
CPR CritiqueofPureReason,translatedbyPaulGuyerandAllenWood,in
Kant1998
CPrR CritiqueofPracticalReason,translatedbyMaryJ.Gregor,inKant1996a:
133–272
CS ‘OntheCommonSaying:ThatMayBeCorrectinTheory,butItIsofno
UseinPractice’,translatedbyMaryJ.Gregor,inKant1996a:273–310
GMM GroundworkoftheMetaphysicsofMorals,translatedbyMaryJ.Gregor,in
Kant1996a:37–108;andonoccasionrevisedinthelightofKant2011
LE LecturesonEthics,translatedbyPeterHeath,inKant1997
LR LecturesonthePhilosophicalDoctrineofReligion,translatedbyAllen
W.Wood,inKant1996b:335–452
MM TheMetaphysicsofMorals,translatedbyMaryJ.Gregor,inKant1996a:
353–604
OCS OntheCommonSaying:ThatMayBeCorrectinTheory,ButItIsofnoUse
inPractice,translatedbyMaryJ.GregorinKant1996a:287–8
PP TowardPerpetualPeace,inKant1996a:311–52
Relig ReligionwithintheBoundariesofMereReason,translatedbyGeorgedi
Giovanni,inKant1996b:39–216